Knowledge Hub

22 July 2025 Dr. Mendus Jacob Articles
From Blueprint to Breakthrough: 5 Strategies to Bring Your College's IDP to Life
from-blueprint-to-breakthrough-5-strategies-to-bring-your-colleges-idp-to-life
The UGC’s IDP guidelines focus on areas such as physical infrastructure, digital transformation, funding, and curriculum realignment. However, creating the plan is just the start – execution is the true challenge. In our last article, we unpacked the 10-year Institutional Development Plan (IDP) blueprint and why it’s a game-changer for higher education. By now, you might have started drafting your college’s IDP (perhaps using a UGC-aligned template) – a visionary roadmap to 2035. But let’s get real: a plan on paper means nothing if it collects dust. The next decade will separate the leaders from the laggards not by who has a plan, but by who acts on it. In fact, the UGC’s latest guidelines position the IDP as a strategic must – even linking it to eligibility for grants. The message is loud and clear: don’t just plan, perform. So how can your institution ensure that its carefully crafted IDP actually delivers results? Here are five key strategies to transform your 10-year plan from a static document into dynamic campus development.
  1. Establish an Action-Oriented IDP Taskforce
An IDP without a dedicated team is like a ship without a captain. Form an IDP implementation taskforce that includes top leadership (Principal/VC and deans), faculty champions, administrative heads, and student/alumni representatives. This cross-functional team will own the plan, drive initiatives, and ensure accountability. UGC’s principles emphasize good governance and stakeholder participation as enablers of smooth IDP execution. Put simply, involve everyone who has a stake in the outcome. When faculty, students, and even industry advisors are part of the planning process, you “bridge trust gaps” and build buy-in from day one. Leadership support is crucial – your top administrators must not only bless the IDP but actively champion it. Have the taskforce meet regularly (e.g. quarterly) to review progress, troubleshoot issues, and adapt plans. Treat the IDP as a living agenda in governing bodies (Boards and Academic Councils), not just an annual formality. With a committed team at the helm, your IDP moves from document to daily discussion, keeping it front-and-center in campus decision-making. Case in Point: At Joya Gogoi College (Assam), the administration formed a NEP 2020-aligned taskforce comprising senior faculty, external experts, and administrators to implement its IDP. This team held regular reviews and built strong interdepartmental collaboration from the start. Similarly, Universal Engineering College (Kerala) brought in an education ministry advisor to guide execution, a move that added external accountability and boosted stakeholder confidence.
  1. Phase Your Plan with Clear Milestones
A 10-year vision can be overwhelming, so break it down. Translate the grand goals into phased targets – for example, 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year milestones. This creates a sense of urgency for near-term wins while pacing longer-term projects. Identify what needs to happen in the next 12-24 months to build momentum (new courses, MOUs, facility upgrades, policy changes, etc.), and what can be scheduled for mid-term (years 3-5) once initial groundwork is laid. Each goal in your IDP should come with SMART objectives (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound). Importantly, tie these to Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). For instance, if your vision is “to be a multidisciplinary institution by 2035,” a 2-year KPI could be launching 3 new interdisciplinary programs, a 5-year KPI could be 30% of students in multidisciplinary courses, and so on. UGC’s IDP guidelines explicitly call for “measurable goals” and periodic reviews for continuous improvement – meaning you should continually check if you’re hitting those interim targets. By phasing the plan, you turn a distant vision into a series of actionable projects and checkpoints. This not only makes execution manageable but also lets you celebrate interim successes, keeping morale high and skeptics at bay. What This Looks Like: Envision a deemed university with a goal to boost research output. To align resources, it redesigns its budgeting process: 30% of the annual budget is now reserved for research development – funding new lab equipment, PhD scholarships, and seed grants for faculty projects. The university also initiates a drive to mobilize resources for its goals: it launches an Alumni Fund specifically for its “Research 2028” initiative and signs MoUs with industry to sponsor technology labs. When setting the year’s expenditures, every line item is checked against IDP goals. For instance, a proposal to renovate the auditorium might be deferred in favor of a new data science laboratory that the IDP identified as critical. This way, the budget itself becomes a strategic tool – if the plan says “increase industry-relevant skills”, then funds are allocated to start new skill centers and not wasted on areas outside the plan. Over time, the administration monitors spending vs. outcomes (e.g., did that ₹50 lakh investment in the robotics lab result in more student projects or patents?) and keeps fine-tuning allocations to ensure money always pushes the college closer to its vision.
  1. Align Budget and Resources with Your Goals
Even the most brilliant strategy will falter if it’s not backed by adequate resources. Early in the IDP implementation, work with your finance office to align the institution’s budget to the plan’s priorities. Create a 5-year financial projection that allocates funds to each major initiative (curriculum revamp, new lab infrastructure, faculty development, etc.). The UGC’s proposed grant eligibility rules make it clear: colleges must not only draft an IDP but also ensure “adequate financial resources… to meet operational requirements”. In other words, don’t plan for programs or facilities you can’t sustain – either identify funding or scale down the idea. Diversify funding sources to fuel your ambitions. The IDP guidelines encourage tapping into government schemes, alumni contributions, industry partnerships, and even CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) funds. Could you launch a fundraising campaign for a new research center? Partner with local industry to sponsor skill-development courses? Many forward-looking colleges are establishing endowment funds and pursuing sponsored research to bankroll their growth. By broadening your funding base, you not only bring in extra capital but also hedge against relying solely on student fees. Remember, a financially sustainable plan is far more likely to succeed. Make your IDP a part of every budget discussion – it’s your business plan for the next decade. In Practice: A nursing college in Kerala aligned their annual budget directly with their IDP goals, setting aside a defined share for infrastructure modernization and faculty capacity building. They also listed clear external funding targets—grants, alumni donations, CSR—to ensure ideas were fundable, not just aspirational.
  1. Cultivate Campus-Wide Buy-In and Innovation
For an IDP to truly reshape your institution, culture is the make-or-break factor. Avoid the common pitfall of treating the IDP as an admin exercise imposed from the top. Instead, engage every level of your campus community in the journey. Here’s how:
  • Communicate the vision: Host town halls, departmental meetings, and student forums to share what the IDP entails and why it matters. When people see the big picture – how flexible curricula, research opportunities, or new facilities will benefit them – they are more likely to support the changes.
  • Empower faculty and staff: Your teachers will be implementing new pedagogies and curricula; your staff will run the new systems. Invest in regular training and capacity building aligned to IDP goals (a point emphasized in NEP 2020 and the IDP guidelines). Recognize and reward innovators: for instance, a faculty member who pioneers a successful industry-linked course, or an administrator who streamlines a digital workflow. This builds a positive buzz around the IDP.
  • Student participation: Involve students through representation in the IDP taskforce, and by creating avenues for feedback on changes (like curriculum updates or campus facilities). Students can also drive initiatives (e.g. start-up clubs, community projects) that align with the plan’s objectives on innovation and inclusivity.
By fostering an inclusive, innovative culture, you turn the IDP from a mandate into a movement. Over time, the mindset shifts from “we have to do this for UGC” to “we want to do this for our own growth.” The UGC Chair noted that adopting an IDP “fosters a culture of accountability and continuous improvement” – indeed, when everyone from the principal to the freshman feels accountable for progress, your institution gains a powerful momentum for change. Illustration: At IIT Bombay, the strategic planning team conducted institute-wide surveys, student town halls, and department-wise reviews to co-create their institutional roadmap. The level of inclusion meant that even bold changes had widespread buy-in. Similarly, Panjab University hosted 17 rounds of stakeholder consultations, including parents, to refine their IDP.
  1. Monitor, Evaluate, and Adapt Relentlessly
Building a future-ready institution is an iterative process. You need a strong monitoring and evaluation (M&E) mechanism to ensure your IDP stays on track amid evolving circumstances. Start by defining clear KPIs for each strategic pillar – from academic excellence (e.g. student success rates, faculty research output) to inclusivity (e.g. enrollment from SEDGs, gender ratio) and industry linkage (e.g. placement rates, number of active MoUs). Many institutions tie these metrics to their IQAC (Internal Quality Assurance Cell) reviews, which is smart – it integrates the IDP with existing quality processes. Conduct annual or bi-annual IDP review meetings where the taskforce (see Strategy #1) analyzes progress data. Are you meeting your short-term targets? Which initiatives are lagging and why? For instance, if your goal was a NAAC score improvement by next cycle and the mid-term review shows slow progress, it’s time to drill down and course-correct. UGC’s framework explicitly suggests “periodic reviews for continuous improvement” as a cornerstone of the IDP approach – so build that into your calendar now. Crucially, be ready to adapt. The higher ed landscape will continue to evolve (think: new technologies, policy shifts, job market trends). A pandemic taught us the need for agility. Your IDP should not be a rigid script but a responsive guide. If a planned initiative becomes irrelevant or unfeasible, don’t hesitate to re-prioritize or find an alternative route. Likewise, seize new opportunities that arise – say, a sudden government grant for digital infrastructure or a chance to collaborate with a foreign university – and weave them into your plan. An effective IDP is both your North Star and a flexible playbook. By monitoring outcomes and staying adaptable, you ensure that by 2035, you’ve not only met your goals on paper but also kept your institution aligned with the times. Real-World Example: Several private universities in Gujarat and Tamil Nadu have implemented live dashboards to monitor IDP metrics—placement rates, research output, MoUs, and student engagement—feeding data directly to the IQAC and leadership for quarterly reviews. If progress stalls (say, in launching an MBA program), they quickly course-correct via faculty hiring, not waiting till the next year. Conclusion: Execute to Transform – The Clock is Ticking Crafting a 10-year plan is commendable, but executing it sets institutions apart. UGC’s push for IDPs is a time-bound chance to align with NEP 2020, achieve excellence, and stay future-ready. Act decisively now, or risk being left behind. An IDP isn’t a document to shelve — it’s a living strategy. Lead boldly, invest in your vision, engage your people, and keep improving. Funding and accreditation will follow those who commit. By 2035, what will your campus look like? That future depends on what you do today. Rally your team, start executing, and shape your institution’s destiny — before time runs out.
Dr. Mendus Jacob Dr. Mendus Jacob

Dr. Mendus Jacob, is the CEO of ipsr solutions limited and Professor & Director of the MCA Programme at Marian College, Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), with over 35 years of experience as an academician and entrepreneur. He is the former Director of School of Applicable Mathematics, M. G. University, Kerala. A Ph.D. in Operations Research with numerous publications, he has served on academic bodies of universities and autonomous institutions, produced Ph.D.s, and been a sought-after resource person for global conferences and faculty development programmes. An expert in NEP, Outcome Based Education, and Accreditation, he has mentored prestigious universities and trained over 40,000 faculty members nationwide on OBE implementation.

All author posts
You may also like

Related posts

  • graphquest-exploring-the-logic-of-links-an-experiential-bootcamp-on-graph-theory-and-connectivity
    Articles
    GraphQuest: Exploring the Logic of Links An Experiential Bootcamp on Graph Theory and Connectivity

    In the spirit of how mathematics has always grown through patterns, connections, and careful reasoning - GraphQuest is designed as a 20-hour immersive bootcamp that brings the foundational ideas of Graph Theory to life. From the earliest problems of bridges and routes to today’s networks and algorithms, graphs have long been a quiet backbone of logical thinking. This bootcamp honours that tradition while presenting it in a way that feels hands-on, relevant, and engaging. Serving as a formative assessment, GraphQuest focuses on strengthening students’ understanding of basic graph-theoretic concepts through exploration, discussion, and guided practice. Instead of treating assessment as a final checkpoint, this bootcamp treats learning as a journey where mistakes are part of the process and connections slowly click into place. Learners actively build, analyse, and interpret graphs to demonstrate their growing command over ideas such as vertices, edges, paths, cycles, and connectivity. Across 20 structured hours, participants will move from intuitive, real-world linkages to formal mathematical representations, blending time-tested methods of problem-solving with interactive activities. The goal is simple but powerful: to ensure that every learner not only knows the definitions of Graph Theory, but truly gets how and why these ideas work. Think of it as old-school rigor, but with modern energy - focused, practical, and low-key exciting.

    Task 1: Visual Graph Dictionary – “See the Shape of Logic”

    Topics: Simple, Complete, Bipartite, Regular Graphs Activity: Each team creates a digital gallery of graph types using hand-drawn sketches or NetworkX visuals, labeling nodes, edges, and degrees. Learning Outcome: Identify and classify different types of graphs and relate visual structures to definitions. Deliverable: Visual collage or PPT poster of at least 6 graph types with short captions.

    Task 2: Build Your Own Graph – “Nodes of Reality”

    Topics: Directed, Undirected, Weighted Graphs Activity: Pick a real-world situation (Instagram followers, road network, WhatsApp chats etc.) and model it as a graph. Learning Outcome: Apply graph theory concepts to model real-world relationships. Deliverable: Graph diagram + explanation of why edges are directed/undirected.

    Task 3: Degree Detective – “Count the Connections”

    Topics: Incidence, Degree, Pendant, Isolated Vertices Activity: Construct small graphs and manually compute degrees of each vertex, identifying pendant and isolated vertices. Learning Outcome: Calculate vertex degrees and interpret graph connectivity. Deliverable: Tabular representation of degrees and classification of vertices.

    Task 4: The Null Network – “When Nothing Connects”

    Topics: Null Graphs, Incidence Matrix, Adjacency Matrix Activity: Visualize graphs and derive their incidence and adjacency matrices using Python / Excel. Learning Outcome: Translate visual graph structure into matrix form. Deliverable: Matrix representation + reflection on how it encodes edge information.

    Task 5: Operation Lab – “Mix, Merge, and Modify”

    Topics: Graph operations (Union, Intersection, Ring sum, Decomposition, Fusion) Activity: Perform operations on two small graphs and observe how edges and vertices change. Learning Outcome: Analyze results of graph operations and identify their use cases. Deliverable: Step-by-step comparison table and visual before/after diagrams.

    Task 6: Pathfinder Challenge – “Find Your Way”

    Topics: Walk, Path, Circuit Activity: Design an activity to trace all possible walks/paths/circuits between two given vertices on a hand-drawn or generated graph. Learning Outcome: Distinguish between walks, paths, and circuits; apply traversal logic. Deliverable: Path tracing worksheet + shortest-path identification.

    Task 7: Isomorphism Hunt – “Different Looks, Same Logic”

    Topics: Graph Isomorphism Activity: Draw all possible simple graphs on 2/3/4 vertices and prove or disprove isomorphism through degree sequences and adjacency matrices. Learning Outcome: Verify graph isomorphism through structural comparison. Deliverable: Written proof + supporting diagrams.

    Task 8: Compiler Dependency Map – “Code Connections”

    Topics: Subgraphs, Connected Components Activity: Represent modules or classes of a small software project as a graph, where edges represent dependencies or imports. Identify isolated modules and strongly connected subgraphs. Learning Outcome: Analyze software architecture using graph-theoretic methods. Deliverable: Dependency graph diagram + list of isolated or tightly coupled modules.

     Task 9: Web Crawler Graph – “From Links to Networks”

    Topics: Directed Graphs, Connectivity Activity: Simulate a web crawler: represent a small set of websites (pages) and their links as a directed graph. Analyze if the graph is strongly connected. Learning Outcome: Relate graph connectivity to web structure and information flow. Deliverable: Python notebook + visual representation of site linking.

    Task 10: GraphVerse – “Connecting All the Connections”

    Activity: Higher Order Thinking Challenge Description: To enhance analytical and evaluative thinking, each team must create 5 Higher Order Thinking (HOTS) questions covering the full set of graph theory topics learned. Instructions:

    • Develop 5 higher-order thinking questions.
    • Each question must align with Bloom’s higher cognitive levels (Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create).
    • Include real-world applications, ethical perspectives, and creative problem-solving.
    • Encourage inter‑topic integration (e.g., connectivity + isomorphism + real‑world networks).

    Deliverables:

    • A document or slide deck with 5 HOTS questions.
    • Each question labeled with its Bloom’s cognitive level.
    • (Optional) Include key points or a model answer for peer learning.

    Learning Outcomes:

    • Apply higher‑order reasoning to graph theory concepts.
    • Demonstrate critical and creative thinking.
    • Connect theory to real‑world computational and ethical scenarios.
    • Strengthen academic discussion and leadership skills.
    18 December 2025
    By Dr. Mendus Jacob
  • formative-and-summative-assessments-in-outcome-based-education-getting-the-balance-right
    Articles
    Formative and Summative Assessments in Outcome-Based Education Getting the Balance Right

    Assessment has always been at the heart of education. Long before Outcome-Based Education (OBE) became a formal framework, teachers intuitively checked understanding during lessons and evaluated learning at the end of courses. OBE doesn’t discard this tradition—it refines it, aligns it, and makes it purposeful. At the core of OBE lie Formative and Summative assessments. Understanding their distinct roles - and using them intentionally - is what separates compliance-driven education from meaningful learning.

    Assessment in OBE: More Than Just Marks

    In OBE, assessment is not about how much content was covered, but how well outcomes were attained. Each assessment must answer a simple question: What evidence do we have that the learner achieved the intended Course Outcomes (COs)? That evidence comes from two complementary assessment types.

    Formative Assessment: Learning in Motion

    Formative assessment is assessment for learning. It happens during the teaching–learning process and provides continuous feedback to both learners and instructors.

    Key Characteristics

    • Conducted regularly
    • Low-stakes or no-stakes
    • Diagnostic and corrective
    • Strongly aligned with COs and Bloom’s levels
    • Focused on improvement, not judgement

    Why It Matters in OBE

    Formative assessments ensure that students are on track to achieve outcomes before it’s too late. They help faculty:

    • Identify learning gaps early
    • Modify teaching strategies
    • Support diverse learners
    • Build higher-order thinking gradually

    Subject-wise Examples

    Mathematics

    • Short quizzes on matrix operations to check procedural understanding (Bloom’s K2–Apply)
    • Think-pair-share problems during lectures to test conceptual clarity

    Computer Science

    • Weekly coding exercises on loops or recursion with instant feedback
    • Debugging tasks where students identify errors in given code (K4–Analyse)

    Management Studies

    • Classroom discussions analysing a short business scenario
    • Reflection notes on leadership styles after a case discussion

    Life Sciences

    • Lab worksheets requiring students to predict outcomes before experiments
    • Concept maps linking biological processes

    Formative assessments create a safe space to fail, reflect, and fix. That’s real learning energy. From Principle to Practice Formative assessment becomes truly powerful when students experience learning as an active process rather than a series of checkpoints. Experiential designs, when aligned with course outcomes, create space for inquiry, mistakes, and conceptual clarity. For example, one way experiential formative assessment can be intentionally designed is illustrated through this linked article, GraphQuest: Exploring the Logic of Links. Structured as an outcome-aligned formative bootcamp, GraphQuest shows how experiential learning can be designed to meet OBE expectations with clear CO and Bloom’s level alignment.

    Summative Assessment: Evidence of Achievement

    Summative assessment is assessment of learning. It is conducted after sufficient learning has taken place and is used to certify achievement of outcomes.

    Key Characteristics

    • High-stakes
    • Conducted at the end of a unit/course/semester
    • Structured and standardized
    • Used for grading, progression, and certification
    • Strong CO–PO mapping relevance

    Why It Matters in OBE

    Summative assessments provide documented, auditable evidence of outcome attainment—critical for:

    • Academic credibility
    • Transparency
    • Accreditation (NAAC, NBA, NIRF)
    • Institutional accountability

    Subject-wise Examples

    Engineering

    • End-semester exams testing design, analysis, and problem-solving
    • Mini projects demonstrating application of core concepts (K5–Evaluate)

    Computer Applications

    • Lab practical exams with real-time problem statements
    • Capstone projects integrating multiple COs and POs

    Commerce

    • Financial analysis case study as an end-term assessment
    • Open-book exams focusing on interpretation rather than memory

    Humanities

    • Research-based essays evaluated using rubrics
    • Presentations assessing argumentation and critical thinking

    Summative assessments answer the big question: Did the learner finally achieve what we promised?

    Formative vs Summative: Not Either–Or, But Both

    AspectFormativeSummative
    PurposeImprove learningMeasure achievement
    TimingDuring learningEnd of learning
    StakesLowHigh
    FeedbackImmediate, descriptiveFinal, evaluative
    OBE RoleSupports attainmentConfirms attainment

    In strong OBE practice, formative feeds summative. When formative assessments are well-designed, summative success becomes natural—not stressful.

    Common Mistakes Institutions Make

    • Treating internal assessments only as mark-generation tools
    • Overloading summative exams with memory-based questions
    • Weak alignment between COs, Bloom’s levels, and assessment tasks
    • Ignoring formative data during attainment analysis

    OBE expects intentional design, not mechanical compliance.

    Moving Forward: Smart, Outcome-Aligned Assessment

    Modern institutions are now leveraging:

    • Rubric-based evaluations
    • CO-wise question tagging
    • Bloom’s level distribution
    • AI-assisted assessment design and analytics

    Yet, the philosophy remains traditional and timeless: Teach with care. Assess with clarity. Improve with evidence. When formative and summative assessments work together, education shifts from marks-driven to meaning-driven. And that’s where real outcomes happen. Author’s Note This article is grounded in practical OBE implementation experience across higher education institutions, aligned with accreditation frameworks and contemporary assessment research, while respecting long-standing pedagogical principles. [/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]
    18 December 2025
    By Dr. Mendus Jacob
  • gemini-3-deep-think-what-faculty-should-know
    Articles
    Gemini 3 Deep Think: What Faculty Should Know

    Google’s most advanced reasoning mode yet — ideal for teaching, research, and academic workflows.

    Stronger Reasoning for Complex Tasks

    • Gemini 3 Deep Think delivers industry-leading reasoning that tackles deep, multi-step problems in areas like logic, math, and scientific analysis.
    • It uses parallel and iterative reasoning rather than surface-level pattern matching, making it more reliable for high-cognitive tasks. 
    • For academics: This means less time refining prompts and more time getting coherent, structured insights — especially useful in research design or advanced problem breakdowns.

    Helps With Research Rigour

    • The enhanced reasoning supports complex hypothesis evaluation and breakdown, aiding literature synthesis, experiment planning, and detailed analytic work.
    • For grant writing and publication drafts, the model’s reasoning aids clarity and logical structure in narratives.

    Better Outputs With Less Prompting

    • Gemini 3 is designed to understand context and intent more deeply, yielding richer and more relevant responses with fewer instructions.
    • Faculty can get higher-quality responses for curriculum queries, detailed explanations, and teaching examples without repeated back-and-forth.

    Supports Multi-Modal Content

    • Beyond text alone, Gemini 3 handles images, audio, video, and code within the same reasoning context — a huge gain for researchers and educators dealing with multimedia materials.
    • Useful for visual data analysis, lecture prep with images/videos, and interactive instructional materials.

    Accelerated Curriculum Development

    • The model’s advanced reasoning and multimodal abilities can help craft lesson sequences, assessment items, case scenarios, and even simulated classroom discussions more efficiently.

    Academic Collaboration & Mentoring

    • Faculty can use Gemini to produce clearer feedback on student work, generate alternative explanations, and co-develop learning resources.
    • It can serve as a smart co-pilot for brainstorming research questions or curricular improvements.

     Benchmark-Level Performance

    • Deep Think outperforms prior models on benchmarks that simulate real reasoning stress tests, indicating that its answers are more thoughtful and structured, not just generative text.

    In a nutshell: For faculty members, the new Gemini release isn’t just about faster answers — it’s about deeper, more structured thinking, richer multimodal understanding, and higher-fidelity educational and research support. These enhancements can streamline teaching prep, elevate research quality, and make classroom engagement more insightful. 
    12 December 2025
    By Dr. Mendus Jacob
Scroll